The AI Infrastructure Mirage | When Capital Outruns Compute

It is tempting to think of bubbles as sudden bursts, charts collapsing and capital vanishing overnight. More often they take quieter forms, when the pace of money outruns the world it is trying to build.

That pattern is emerging again in artificial intelligence. The problem is not demand. Enterprise adoption continues to expand, inference workloads are rising, and models like ChatGPT remain among the most widely used products on the planet. 

The problem is scale. The rate at which data centers can be financed, permitted, and powered has not changed, even as investment cycles have accelerated tenfold.

From TechCrunch Disrupt to Wall Street’s syndicate desks, the unease is visible. The AI boom is becoming an infrastructure mirage. Meta, Oracle, and xAI together have pledged close to one trillion dollars in projects, but most of that capacity will not exist until the decade’s end.

When the world’s most liquid investors are betting on steel, silicon, and power infrastructure that has not yet been built, the line between foresight and overreach becomes harder to see.

Two of our top analysts have done the impossible — they’ve consistently spotted memecoins before they exploded.

I’m talking gains like 8,200%... 4,915%... and 3,110%, all triggered by a proven system that’s delivered 20+ big wins.

Now they’ve uncovered a brand-new memecoin showing the same explosive signals — and it could be next.

That’s why we’re revealing the #1 Memecoin to Own Right Now (time-sensitive).

[See the pick before the next breakout begins →]

© 2025 Boardwalk Flock LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2382 Camino Vida Roble, Suite I Carlsbad, CA 92011, United States. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Readers acknowledge that the authors are not engaging in the rendering of legal, financial, medical, or professional advice. The reader agrees that under no circumstances Boardwalk Flock, LLC is responsible for any losses, direct or indirect, which are incurred as a result of the use of the information contained within this, including, but not limited to, errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Results may not be typical and may vary from person to person. Making money trading digital currencies takes time and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk.

A generation of investors has begun to treat AI infrastructure as destiny. Oracle, SoftBank, and OpenAI have layered new financing structures on top of an unfinished foundation, each assuming demand that may not arrive on schedule.

The economics appear strong on paper. AI workloads continue to grow, training costs are falling, and inference models are commercially viable. Yet the physical bottlenecks of power supply, transformer availability, and construction timelines still move at a human pace.

This mismatch between financial velocity and physical reality has created a trillion dollar feedback loop. 

Oracle’s data center in New Mexico has already drawn eighteen billion dollars in credit from twenty banks. Meta has pledged more than six hundred billion dollars in new buildouts. SoftBank’s Stargate project is stacking another five hundred billion. 

Even if every projection holds, most of that capacity will not come online before 2028.

At the same time, only a fraction of Fortune 500 firms use AI at meaningful scale. Microsoft’s Satya Nadella recently said his biggest concern is not chips, but the availability of “warm shells to plug into.”

The risk is not collapse but drag, a cycle of overbuilt and overlevered facilities chasing workloads that evolve faster than construction timelines.

The AI trade is becoming the inverse of the early internet bubble. Then, there was too much code chasing too little capital. Today, there is too much capital chasing too little code.

Investor signal 

When infrastructure becomes the story, the cycle is aging. The winners in this phase will be those who manage utilization, not expansion.

CoreWeave’s third quarter revenue more than doubled to 1.36 billion dollars, but the company’s balance sheet tells a more complicated story. 

Total debt has surged to 14 billion dollars, interest expense now runs at an annualized rate of 1.25 billion, and return on capital remains roughly half its cost of capital. 

The company’s backlog expanded to 55 billion dollars, a figure that has quickly become shorthand for both the promise and the peril of the AI boom.

The delays at data centers in Texas and Oklahoma illustrate how thin the margin for error has become. Even modest construction setbacks can ripple through multi-billion dollar supply chains and trigger covenant pressure in highly leveraged structures. 

CoreWeave’s business model depends on continuous uptime and recurring AI workloads, yet much of its near-term debt is secured by facilities still under construction.

This imbalance is spreading across the sector. Since September, hyperscalers have raised 93 billion dollars in new debt to fund AI infrastructure, and another 100 billion is expected in 2026. 

Investors are already beginning to distinguish between cash-generative operators like Microsoft and Meta and smaller firms reliant on structured credit.

Investor signal 

AI’s next constraint is not innovation but interest expense. Capital is shifting from venture to credit, and balance sheet strength is quickly replacing narrative as the defining moat.

Some stocks are built for a quarter… others for a lifetime.

Our 7 Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever report reveals companies with the strength to deliver year after year - through recessions, rate hikes, and even the next crash.

One is a tech leader with a 15% payout ratio - leaving decades of room for dividend growth. 

Another is a utility that’s paid every quarter for 96 years straight. 

And that’s not all - we’ve included 5 more companies that treat payouts as high priority.

These are the stocks that anchor portfolios and keep paying.

This is your chance to see all 7 names and tickers - from a consumer staples powerhouse with 20 years of outperformance to a healthcare leader with 61 years of payout hikes. 

The report is free for a limited time - go here to get it now.

Meta, OpenAI, and xAI have each introduced financing models that stretch the limits of conventional corporate structure. Meta’s 30 billion dollar Hyperion project in Louisiana blends private equity, project finance, and investment grade bonds into a single vehicle. 

Blue Owl Capital and Pimco hold the senior tranches, earning returns comparable to high yield credit but backed by Meta’s off balance sheet guarantee. 

The deal’s complexity lies in its optionality. Meta can walk away from its lease every four years, yet must still make investors whole if it does.

Oracle and OpenAI’s 38 billion dollar Stargate deal is even more ambitious. It represents the largest single project-finance loan in technology history, with over thirty global and regional banks participating. 

Oracle will lease the facilities, OpenAI will operate them, and lenders will distribute exposure across insurers and private credit funds. A structure of this size and duration would have been unthinkable in the last tech cycle.

Meanwhile, Elon Musk’s xAI is raising as much as 20 billion dollars for its Colossus 2 data center in Tennessee, collateralizing Nvidia chips through a private credit fund led by Valor and Apollo. 

The vehicle could ultimately resemble an asset backed security built on compute inventory rather than property. Each of these transactions marks a step in the same direction: converting infrastructure risk into a tradeable asset class.

Investor signal 

The frontier of AI finance is less about technology than time. These deals transform compute into yield, and the biggest question now is not who innovates fastest but who can sustain duration when rates rise or workloads plateau.

Michael Burry, who became a household name after predicting the subprime crisis, has turned his attention to accounting beneath the AI boom. 

In a post this week, he accused the major cloud and infrastructure providers of inflating earnings by lengthening the assumed lifespan of their GPU and server hardware.

By stretching a three-year depreciation schedule to five or six years, companies reduce annual expense and report higher profits.

Burry estimated that the adjustment could understate depreciation by 176 billion dollars from 2026 through 2028, overstating profits at Oracle and Meta by more than twenty percent. The allegation is difficult to verify, but it highlights how central accounting assumptions have become to the AI trade. 

Analysts have noted that when equipment cycles are this short, small changes in depreciation estimates can materially alter reported earnings per share.

This practice also complicates valuation models. Extending useful life lowers near-term costs but creates a steeper cliff when assets eventually turn obsolete. If the replacement cycle accelerates, the impact on margins could resemble a delayed shock. 

That tension between aggressive accounting and genuine productivity mirrors the final years of several past tech expansions, when investors mistook temporary efficiency for sustainable profitability.

Investor signal 

If depreciation turns into the next battleground for earnings quality, the conversation will shift toward cash flow integrity and replacement cost. The strongest operators will be those whose growth narrative still aligns with their accounting reality.

 Now It's About to Transform the World

After his wife's untimely death, he used Artificial Intelligence to get sweet revenge...

But what happened next could change everything... while making a select few early investors very rich. 

Get the whole weird story here.

AI’s infrastructure surge has entered its reflexive phase, where capital drives narrative and narrative drives more capital. From CoreWeave’s leveraged expansion to Meta’s project bonds and Burry’s accounting critique, the trade now runs through every level of finance.

The story is no longer just about innovation. It is about how fast belief can be converted into credit, and how long physics will allow that belief to compound.

In the end, the most valuable AI asset may not be compute capacity but discipline.